Amazon Aggregator Spree End in Bankruptcy

The surge of Amazon aggregators—companies that acquire successful third-party sellers on Amazon's marketplace—was a hallmark of the e-commerce boom during the COVID-19 pandemic.¹ These aggregators raised significant capital, aiming to consolidate and scale brands thriving in the rapidly expanding online shopping environment. However, as consumer spending patterns shifted post-pandemic, several aggregators have faced financial difficulties, leading some to file for bankruptcy. ¹

Rise of Amazon Aggregators

During the height of the pandemic, online shopping experienced unprecedented growth. Consumers turned to e-commerce platforms for their purchasing needs, and Amazon became a primary beneficiary.¹ Aggregators seized this opportunity by:

• Raising Large Sums from Investors: Attracting billions in funding to acquire successful Amazon sellers.¹

• Aggressive Acquisition Strategies: Purchasing numerous small businesses to build diversified portfolios.¹

• Leveraging Economies of Scale: Optimizing operations across multiple brands to increase profitability.¹

According to research firm Marketplace Pulse, the market included 93 companies, with 55 announcing fundraising rounds and 31 raising at least $100 million.⁴ In total, these companies raised $16.2 billion in the last three years, much of it in debt from financial giants like BlackRock, Goldman Sachs, and Bain Capital.⁴

Financial Challenges Post-Pandemic

As the pandemic subsided, consumer behavior began shifting back towards in-person shopping and services like travel and dining. This change led to a slowdown in online sales growth, impacting the revenue streams of aggregators reliant on e-commerce dominance. SOURCE Key challenges faced include:

• Decreased Online Sales Growth: Reduced consumer spending online affected the profitability of acquired brands.³

• High Debt Levels: Significant debt taken on to fund acquisitions became burdensome as revenues declined.²

• Increased Competition: Operating within Amazon's ecosystem meant competing not only with other third-party sellers but also with Amazon's own products.⁴

• Amazon's Policy Changes: Amazon increased commission rates from third-party sellers by 30%, further reducing aggregator profitability.⁴

Case Studies: Thrasio and Benitago

Thrasio

• Bankruptcy Filing: Thrasio filed for Chapter 11 bankruptcy protection in a New Jersey court.¹

• Debt Restructuring: Aims to cut about $495 million in debt and defer interest payments for a year after exiting bankruptcy.¹

• Financial Support: Received commitments of up to $90 million in new financing from lenders.¹

• Assets and Liabilities: Lists up to $10 billion in assets and up to $1 billion in liabilities.¹

• CEO's Statement: Greg Greeley expressed that with a strengthened balance sheet and new capital, Thrasio would be better equipped to support its brands and scale infrastructure.¹

Benitago

• Bankruptcy Declaration: Filed for bankruptcy as its growth and capital structure became unsustainable.²

• Funding History: Raised $325 million in 2021 during the peak of investor enthusiasm for e-commerce aggregators.⁴

• Business Operations:

  • Sold nearly 1,000 products across various categories including home goods, beauty, and nutrition.²

  • Relied heavily on Amazon's Fulfillment By Amazon service.²

• Financial Struggles: Faced challenges due to significant debt taken on to fund acquisitions and a decline in online sales.²

• Restructuring Efforts: Appointed a chief restructuring officer to oversee bankruptcy proceedings.²

Industry Implications and Trends

The financial struggles of aggregators like Thrasio and Benitago highlight several important implications:

• Market Saturation Risks: Aggressive acquisition strategies without sustainable revenue models can lead to overextension.³

• Dependence on a Single Platform: Reliance on Amazon exposes businesses to significant operational risks, including policy changes and increased fees.⁴

• Investor Caution: The decline of aggregators may lead to increased scrutiny from investors regarding business models heavily dependent on market conditions that may not be sustainable long-term.³

• Consolidation in the Industry:

  • Mergers and Acquisitions: Companies like SellerX and Razor Group have been acquiring other aggregators to strengthen their portfolios.⁴

  • Reduced Funding: Funding for aggregator startups has significantly decreased, with a notable drop compared to the peak in 2021.⁴

• Regulatory Lessons: The aggregators' challenges within Amazon's ecosystem demonstrate the difficulties of operating in a highly centralized market controlled by a single dominant player.⁴

Challenges within Amazon's Ecosystem

Aggregators attempted to replicate strategies used by large consumer goods companies like Procter & Gamble by:

• Centralizing Brands: Owning multiple brands under one umbrella to leverage economies of scale.⁴

• Operating Under Amazon's Oversight: Unlike traditional markets, Amazon's ecosystem is tightly controlled, limiting the aggregators' ability to influence market dynamics.⁴

• Competing Against Amazon: In addition to other third-party sellers, aggregators often found themselves competing directly with Amazon's own products, which had more visibility and favorable positioning on the platform.⁴

Conclusion

The rise and subsequent challenges of Amazon aggregators serve as a cautionary tale about rapid growth without sustainable foundations. As consumer spending patterns evolve and the e-commerce landscape becomes more competitive, businesses reliant on aggressive acquisition strategies must adapt to changing market conditions. The aggregator model's future will depend on the ability to create value beyond mere consolidation, emphasizing operational efficiency, brand development, and diversification beyond single-platform dependencies.

Quick Hits:

• TSA Wants to Expand Cyber Rules for Pipelines and Railroads

• Tesla and US bank stocks jump in post-election trades as renewables slump

• Over $2.8 billion bet on bitcoin topping $90,000 as it hits all-time high
  

Follow Us:

𝕏: https://x.com/BuysideJournal

_{1. AP News, Major Amazon seller Thrasio files for bankruptcy protection, 2024.}

_{2. Retail Dive, Amazon brand incubator Benitago files for bankruptcy, 2023.}

_{3. The Wall Street Journal, Amazon Brand-Buying Sprees End in Bankruptcy, 2024.}

_{4. CTech by Calcalist, The end of Amazon aggregators: How the e-commerce acquirers' bubble burst, 2023.}

_{The content herein is solely for informational purposes and should not be viewed as investment or any other advice or a current or past recommendation, or an offer to sell or the solicitation to buy securities or adopt any investment strategy. Certain of this material has been generated by an artificial intelligence language model, ChatGPT, which has been prompted to provide topical finance-related articles. The articles herein may not reflect the most current news, events, or developments. While we strive for accuracy, there may be limitations, inaccuracies, or biases present, and The Buyside Journal (including, for the avoidance of doubt, its affiliates) assumes no liability for the content herein and does not guarantee the accuracy, adequacy or completeness of such information (and does not undertake any duty to correct or update such information). Readers are encouraged to independently verify the information herein and consult with professionals for specific advice or information. Predictions, opinions, and other information contained herein are subject to change continually and without notice of any kind and to the extent accurate initially may no longer be true after the date indicated. Forward-looking statements are subject to numerous assumptions, risks and uncertainties, which change over time. Actual results could differ materially from those anticipated in forward-looking statements.}